Campaign India Team
Oct 27, 2020

Editors Guild of India issues statement on the standoff between Mumbai Police and Republic TV

The association is 'pained to see FIRs being filed against journalists at Republic TV' but also questioned the channel's reporting

Editors Guild of India issues statement on the standoff between Mumbai Police and Republic TV
The Editors Guild of India has issued a statement on the ongoing standoff between the Mumbai Police and Republic TV.
 
The association has labelled the standoff 'unprecedented' and stated that it is 'pained to see FIRs being filed against journalists at Republic TV'. 
 
The Republic TV is currently undergoing investigation for a TRP manipulating scam by the Mumbai Police.
 
The statement by the Editors Guild of India also commented on and questioned Republic TV's reporting during the demise of actor Sushant Singh Rajput .
 
Here's the statement in full: 
 
The Editors Guild of India is pained to see the unedifying spectacle of hundreds of FIRs being filed against journalists of Republic TV, which is under probe for allegedly manipulating TRPs and spreading discontent against Mumbai Police. We do not wish to influence the probe by the authorities, even if we recognise it has the potential to bring in much needed transparency of the manipulation of popularity, and creation of "proceeds of crime" - as cliamed by the police; but the victimisation of the journalists should immediately stop. The use of arbitrary state power is not and has never been in the interests of working journalists.
 
This standoff between the Mumbai Police and the TV channel is unprecedented and threatens the tenuous but important balance between media freedom and the imperative for it to reside within the law. Right to free speech does not mean a licese to promote hate speech.
 
Besides the unsavory details pertaining to the manipulation of TRPs, the Republic TV's high-strung conduct during the unfortunate demise of film actor, Sushant Singh Rajput also raises issues about media credibility and the limits to reporting. The Mumbai High Court has pertinently asked the channel's laywer about harangue directed at actress Rhea Chakraborty. The High Court asked a question that must be addressed by all: "Is this part of investigative journalism? Asking the public about their opinion on who who should be arrested?" Also, the bench wondered whether the channel in the name of investigative journalism was encroaching into the domain of police. Similar reservations about its conduct have been expressed even by News Broadcaster's Association (NBA) that disagrees with its reporting.
 
These are important issues that should have been resolved long ago, but were allowed to fester. It is high time the channel behaves responsibly and not compromises the safety of its journalists as well as hurt the collective credibility of media. The police must ensure that its investigation does not hurt the channel's journalists or makes any arrests. And that the investigation does not become a tool to suppress media rights.
 
Source:
Campaign India

Follow us

Top news, insights and analysis every weekday

Sign up for Campaign Bulletins

Related Articles

Just Published

15 hours ago

DPDP’s parental consent chaos: The latest hurdle ...

Navigating the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act's draft rules on children’s data poses steep compliance challenges for ad agencies. Campaign finds out what’s at stake.

18 hours ago

Moves and wins roundup: Week of 06 Jan

Our weekly roundup of the latest appointments and account wins from Maddock Films, Havas Media Network and many more.

19 hours ago

Does OPPO’s Reno13 campaign truly capture living in ...

The smartphone company and Famous Innovations inspire a ‘carpe diem’ lifestyle with the new Reno13 Series brand film.

19 hours ago

Quick buzz or backlash: Are negative marketing ...

SOUNDING BOARD: Do attention-grabbing gimmicks prioritise instant media coverage over ethics? Campaign asks experts if publicity at all costs is indeed a viable strategy.