Campaign India Team
Oct 27, 2020

Editors Guild of India issues statement on the standoff between Mumbai Police and Republic TV

The association is 'pained to see FIRs being filed against journalists at Republic TV' but also questioned the channel's reporting

Editors Guild of India issues statement on the standoff between Mumbai Police and Republic TV
The Editors Guild of India has issued a statement on the ongoing standoff between the Mumbai Police and Republic TV.
 
The association has labelled the standoff 'unprecedented' and stated that it is 'pained to see FIRs being filed against journalists at Republic TV'. 
 
The Republic TV is currently undergoing investigation for a TRP manipulating scam by the Mumbai Police.
 
The statement by the Editors Guild of India also commented on and questioned Republic TV's reporting during the demise of actor Sushant Singh Rajput .
 
Here's the statement in full: 
 
The Editors Guild of India is pained to see the unedifying spectacle of hundreds of FIRs being filed against journalists of Republic TV, which is under probe for allegedly manipulating TRPs and spreading discontent against Mumbai Police. We do not wish to influence the probe by the authorities, even if we recognise it has the potential to bring in much needed transparency of the manipulation of popularity, and creation of "proceeds of crime" - as cliamed by the police; but the victimisation of the journalists should immediately stop. The use of arbitrary state power is not and has never been in the interests of working journalists.
 
This standoff between the Mumbai Police and the TV channel is unprecedented and threatens the tenuous but important balance between media freedom and the imperative for it to reside within the law. Right to free speech does not mean a licese to promote hate speech.
 
Besides the unsavory details pertaining to the manipulation of TRPs, the Republic TV's high-strung conduct during the unfortunate demise of film actor, Sushant Singh Rajput also raises issues about media credibility and the limits to reporting. The Mumbai High Court has pertinently asked the channel's laywer about harangue directed at actress Rhea Chakraborty. The High Court asked a question that must be addressed by all: "Is this part of investigative journalism? Asking the public about their opinion on who who should be arrested?" Also, the bench wondered whether the channel in the name of investigative journalism was encroaching into the domain of police. Similar reservations about its conduct have been expressed even by News Broadcaster's Association (NBA) that disagrees with its reporting.
 
These are important issues that should have been resolved long ago, but were allowed to fester. It is high time the channel behaves responsibly and not compromises the safety of its journalists as well as hurt the collective credibility of media. The police must ensure that its investigation does not hurt the channel's journalists or makes any arrests. And that the investigation does not become a tool to suppress media rights.
 
Source:
Campaign India

Related Articles

Just Published

7 hours ago

India's athlete endorsements touch INR 1,224 crores ...

India’s sports sponsorship industry crosses INR 16,633 crores in 2024, posting a growth even in non-cricket sponsorships, finds GroupM ESP report.

14 hours ago

Digidarts expands to the Middle East

To target the high-growth markets of UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait for its AI-driven customised solutions for brand marketers and advertisers.

15 hours ago

Masoom Minawala steps down from Schbang MMaximise

Schbang MMaximise to be merged into Schbang Fluence, Schbang's influencer management division.

16 hours ago

Why Snap’s creative chief is doubling down on ...

EXCLUSIVE: Veteran creative and former W+K leader Colleen DeCourcy on Snapchat’s new brand positioning, why the company is ‘anti-social media’, the benefits of in-housing, and more.