The Gender Sensitivity score is based on the following parameters:
0.5-1.5: Gender offensive, 1.5- 2.5: Gender stereotypical, 2.5-3.5: Gender Neutral, 3.5- 4.5: Gender Sensitive, 4.5-5: Gender transformative.
What worked:
The ad demonstrates gender sensitivity by portraying a partnership between the couple where traditional gender roles are challenged. The husband is actively involved in household chores like renovating the home and breaking away from stereotypes. The narrative highlights each other's strengths emphasising mutual respect and equality in the relationship. Additionally, the inclusion of the wife's parents in the family dynamics, as symbolised by the nameplate, showcases the importance of the woman's parents also having an equal right to live with her. This is particularly important in the Indian context where parents seem to have the right and freedom to stay with only their Son's family. The ad highlights the importance of familial relationships and equality in decision-making.
Gender Sensitivity Score (GSS): 2.5/5
What could have worked:
The ad seems to be promoting consumeristic behaviour and brand consciousness among children by emphasising the importance of fashion, variety, and inclusivity in clothing choices. While providing hypoallergenic and environmentally sustainable options is commendable, the focus on fashion trends and reaching a wide audience through a social media influencer may contribute to materialistic attitudes in children. This influence can lead to children feeling pressured to conform to certain standards of style and brand preferences, potentially impacting their self-esteem and sense of identity. Additionally, the accessibility of the brand messaging and inaccessibility of the brand's products to large sections of children who cannot afford the brand may encourage children to prioritise clothing as a means of self-expression, self-worth and identity which can have negative effects.
GSS: 2.25/5
The use of Bobby Deol in Nilkamal Sleep's campaign seems appropriate given his popularity and resonance with the brand's philosophy. However, if the portrayal in the ad resembles his toxic role in 'Animal,' it could potentially be objectionable as it may unintentionally justify or glamorise negative behaviour. Advertisers need to be mindful of the context in which they portray celebrities to ensure alignment with their brand values and messaging.
GSS: 2.25/5
Other films from the week:
GSS: 2.75/5
GSS: 3/5
GSS: 3/5
GSS: 3/5
.jpg&h=334&w=500&q=100&v=20250320&c=1)
.jpg&h=334&w=500&q=100&v=20250320&c=1)
.jpg&h=334&w=500&q=100&v=20250320&c=1)
.jpg&h=334&w=500&q=100&v=20250320&c=1)
.jpg&h=334&w=500&q=100&v=20250320&c=1)
.jpg&h=268&w=401&q=100&v=20250320&c=1)
.jpeg&h=268&w=401&q=100&v=20250320&c=1)
.jpeg&h=268&w=401&q=100&v=20250320&c=1)
.png&h=268&w=401&q=100&v=20250320&c=1)
