Nick Jefferson
Feb 06, 2014

Porn and the Super Bowl

If advertising were a porn film, then the Super Bowl would be the ‘money shot’. Literally.

Porn and the Super Bowl
Each year, our industry gathers itself onto one collective sofa, and – surrounded by cold beer and Cheetos –  gorges itself.
 
Together, we analyse, appraise and, often, pour jealous scorn on the 30 second spots that constitute this annual festival of advertising.
 
At its best, this is the triumph of innovation meeting capitalism; super-charging brands and powering economies with a wave of the magic creative wand. At its worst, it’s a shallow, self-referential adventure in narcissism. As Charles Van Es, Head of Marketing for Heineken USA Portfolio Brands said recently, “If there is one opportunity ripe for commenting on the bullshit of marketing, the Super Bowl is probably as good as it gets”.
 
But in amongst the ‘winners’ and the ‘losers’, the dissections of ‘integratability’ and longevity of ideas, the deliberately provocative, the schmaltz and all the rest, there is perhaps an elephant in the room this year. And it ain’t Alan Branch.
 
Innovative creativity 
 
The big story, I think, is the number of brands taking a fairly revolutionary approach as to how they make hay while the Super Bowl sun shines. And this is an approach that, one way or another, risks seriously diminishing the traditional roles of both creative agencies and media agencies alike.
 
Newcastle Brown Ale’s “mega huge football game” piss-take is a fabulous example. Hats off to the brilliant Droga 5 (for whom such disruption is bang on-brand) but pity the media agency that, with such a cheap and cheerful website and simple YouTube film, seriously missed out.
 
Or take Doritos commitment to crowdsourcing creative. “We’re learning,” asserts owner PepsiCo’s CMO, “that ideas comes from anywhere”.  Cue a whole army of ECDs quietly sobbing into their Budweisers……
 
The ‘Oreo’ moment 
 
And of course the thing that all the brands really want in 2014? An Oreos moment, d’apres the cookie’s Twitter-based success last year. As far as I can work out, that depends less on traditional agencies, their models and people, than it does on having a handful of smart, agile folk sitting in a ‘war room’.
 
I’m reviewing a book at the moment by Rose Fass. It’s called ‘Chocolate Conversations’, and one of its key tenets is the importance of businesses being “addicted to relevance”.
 
Back at work on Monday, as the hangovers die down, agency-land might want to reflect on this.
 
Or this could be one adult movie that doesn’t enjoy, ahem, a ‘happy ending’.
 
The article first appeared on www.campaignlive.co.uk
 

 

Source:
Campaign India
Tags

Related Articles

Just Published

2 days ago

89% of CMOs predict growth in their marketing ...

Nearly 59% of CMOs expect that in the next five years, their revenues will come from products, services, or businesses that don’t yet exist, finds Dentsu's 2024 CMO Navigator survey.

2 days ago

'All polish, no punch': Adland reacts to Jaguar’s ...

The internet has spoken about Jaguar's radical rebrand with mixed reviews. But what do industry experts think?

2 days ago

Parle’s ‘GIF it a go!’: A sweet play on connection ...

The Minimalist's GIF-inspired campaign for Hide & Seek captures Gen Z with humour, relatability, and everyday moments.

2 days ago

VdoCipher introduces live streaming services to ...

Real-time engagement through live streaming offers Indian advertisers a robust tool for deeper connections and data-driven campaign optimisation.