Campaign India Team
Dec 15, 2009

Anant’s blog: Farewell, Bajaj scooters

I, for one, am not going to mourn the death of the Bajaj scooter.The Bajaj scooter represented almost everything that was wrong in India during the period of dominance. It was a poor product, noisy, unsafe. Overall, the company cared little for the consumer, ensuring only that they sold as many scooters as possible while making as much profit as possible. For decades, protected by the license Raj, Bajaj had a monopoly on scooters. This caused, as the license Raj caused in any number of categories, an acute demand-supply gap which allowed a healthy black market to flourish.

Anant’s blog: Farewell, Bajaj scooters

I, for one, am not going to mourn the death of the Bajaj scooter.

The Bajaj scooter represented almost everything that was wrong in India during the period of dominance. It was a poor product, noisy, unsafe. Overall, the company cared little for the consumer, ensuring only that they sold as many scooters as possible while making as much profit as possible.

For decades, protected by the license Raj, Bajaj had a monopoly on scooters. This caused, as the license Raj caused in any number of categories, an acute demand-supply gap which allowed a healthy black market to flourish.

And the consumer was grateful that he could get his hands on a Bajaj, sometimes paying almost 50% premium on the list price.

And the scooter continued to be overpriced, continued to be unsafe.

In a funny way, I’m almost delighted that it died.

And that’s what makes the Bajaj story interesting. To shrug off the past and to learn to compete in a completely free market couldn’t have been easy. The motorcycle market is, today, a crowded one. And Bajaj woke up and grappled with competition. They acknowledged that the consumer mattered, that they had to meet consumer wants and needs in order to do well, in order, even, to simply survive.

Today, Bajaj dominates the mid-price segment, accounting for 6 out every 10 motorcycles sold in the country.

The Bajaj story is a rare one. There are a number of companies which dominated categories during the years of the license Raj, only to fritter away their considerable advantages. Hindustan Motors is one such, Premier Auto is another, Standard Motors is a third.

The difference with Bajaj was that the company woke up to see the writing on the wall. They saw that the rules of the game had changed, that the consumer was not a moron, that the consumer would walk away from a product or service that was sub-standard.

Heritage and age of the company matter little in the new environment.

At Campaign India, we’ve stubbornly refused to see merit in stories about anniversaries that PR agencies and marketers keep trying to convince us to carry.

What is the value to the consumer of a 10 year-old or 100 year-old company or brand that doesn’t care compared to a one day old brand that does?

Ask Bajaj. Once upon a time, you just couldn’t beat a Bajaj. Now, you can – but Bajaj doesn’t allow you to.

Source:
Campaign India

Related Articles

Just Published

20 hours ago

ASCI flags 98% ads as misleading in 2024 review

A major chunk of these ads are from real estate and online betting sectors.

21 hours ago

Streambox unveils subscription TV; aims to acquire ...

Can its Dor subscription-based service, which aims to unify content across OTT platforms and live TV channels, truly be a disruptor in India's television market?

22 hours ago

Vi’s ‘Be someone’s we’ bridges hearts, one tower at ...

The campaign builds on from its earlier legs, and showcases how one could be connected to their family and friends from wherever they may be.

23 hours ago

Google’s US antitrust trial comes to an end as both ...

Decision on if Google would be held accountable and face consequences might not come before Q1 2025, according to Judge Leonie Brinkema.