Gideon Spanier
Nov 27, 2015

Lad mags failed because 'most men use moisturiser and take selfies now'

Men don't want to portray a 'laddish' image on social media, according to the editor of ShortList

Lad mags failed because 'most men use moisturiser and take selfies now'
Martin Robinson, whose men's title celebrates its 400th issue this week, said old-style lads' print mags had not recognised "a shift in how men are thinking about themselves away from that laddish culture, which has kind of disappeared".
 
He continued: "Equality in the workplace, the new feminism and the rise of social media mean men are very aware of the image they’re portraying. You don’t want to be showing yourself off as a ‘lad mag face’ [on social media]. You want to give that message you’re a professional – a bit stylish and aspirational."
 
He said the word "metrosexual", once used to describe a rare man in touch with his emotional side, "seems totally irrelevant now" because it is how most men behave. 
 
"People used to say, ‘are men interested in clothes, in grooming, in talking about their feelings?’ Turns out we are. Most men are using moisturizer and taking selfies. It’s a much freer world."
 
ShortList was founded in 2007 as an independently-owned free weekly and positioned as a more thoughtful read than Zoo and Nuts and other lads’ mags, which were still selling strongly at the time.
 
"There were no girls and more emphasis on intelligent journalism – on art as well as sport and gadgets," Robinson said of ShortList’s launch. "There were quite a lot of ‘male interest’ stories. We were early to write about depression and addiction.
 
"They weren’t being discussed in men’s magazines. It was all, ‘aren’t we great, chaps?’"
 
The lads’ mag era ended last week when Bauer announced it was suspending publication of FHM and Zoo, and after the closure of Loaded and Nuts.
 
Robinson said: "I don’t think they went wrong. Their audiences moved away from them. Then they had to chase the audience [online] and Nuts and Zoo became very flesh-heavy at the end and they lost a bit of integrity."
 
Robinson maintained that ShortList’s "positive, aspirational" agenda and dependence on advertising and sponsored content didn’t affect its editorial approach.
 
Brand partnerships, such as its music events with Unilever deodorant brand Lynx, showed the benefits of teaming up with an advertiser willing to underwrite the cost.
 
He said: "Advertisers don’t want to badge things in the old way. They want to create something more unique. You can transform your ideas into much bigger operations [by working with a brand]".
 
ShortList is primarily a print brand with a 500,000 circulation. ShortList Media, its parent company, is now a £25 million-a-year business, after expanding with sister title Stylist for women.
 
Robinson said: "People still want to read print but they don’t want to pay for it."
 
This article first appeared on CampaignLive.co.uk
 
 
Source:
Campaign India

Related Articles

Just Published

6 hours ago

Can Bluesky disrupt social media marketing in India?

With its user-base growing rapidly, will this decentralised platform shake the dominance of giants like X, while redefining the audience engagement rules for brand advertisers?

6 hours ago

What Chrome’s potential spin-off means for browsers ...

As the Department of Justice pushes for Google to divest Chrome, the ripple effects could redefine browser competition, shake up web standards, and disrupt the advertising ecosystem as we know it.

6 hours ago

When creativity misses the mark: What brands can ...

While creativity is currency in advertising, Branding Area’s marketing director states that even the richest ideas can bankrupt a brand’s message when mishandled, while nodding at Jaquar’s latest campaign.

7 hours ago

It's time we stopped treating Gen AI like our dirty ...

All this heated discourse about AI in creativity misses a simple truth: This revolution isn't waiting for universal approval. It's already here—time to trade the resistance for renaissance.