Staff Reporters
Aug 07, 2024

Musk’s X sues advertisers over alleged ‘illegal boycott’

“We tried peace for two years, now it is war,” Musk posted on X about the lawsuit following a significant dip in adspend on the platform since 2023.

Photo: Getty Images.
Photo: Getty Images.

Remember when Elon Musk told advertisers fleeing Twitter to "go f*** yourself"? Now, his rebranded platform, X, has filed an antitrust lawsuit alleging a conspiracy among major advertisers and a global advertising alliance to cripple the company through an "illegal boycott". 

The lawsuit, filed in a Texas federal court, specifically names the World Federation of Advertisers (WFA), Unilever, Mars Inc, CVS Health, and Orsted, and alleges that the trade group and several advertisers conspired to withhold “billions of dollars" in ad spend over concerns that X would “deviate from certain brand safety standards for advertising". 

X claims these entities acted in concert through the WFA's Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM) and cost the platform billions in lost ad revenue by collectively withholding their spending.

Musk tweeted: "We tried being nice for 2 years and got nothing but empty words. Now, it is war."

He quoted a post by X CEO Linda Yaccarino, titled 'An open letter to advertisers', which said in part: “To put it simply, people are hurt when the marketplace of ideas is undermined and some viewpoints are not funded over others as part of an illegal boycott… The illegal behavior of these organisations and their executives cost X billions of dollars. No small group of people should monopolise what gets monetised."

In November 2023, concerns about ads appearing next to pro-Nazi content and hate speech led to a wave of advertisers—includng Disney, Apple and IBM—abandoning X.  

At the time, X said it does not intentionally place brands next to "this kind of content". However,  Musk's controversial endorsement of an antisemitic conspiracy theory further fuelled the issue.

X's legal action comes after a prolonged period of tension with the advertising industry. Ad revenue plummeted following Musk's takeover, fuelled by advertiser anxieties over the platform's content moderation policies.

The current lawsuit (a copy is availabe at this link) points to a July 2023 report by the House Judiciary Committee, which investigated GARM's practices and concluded that their actions "rob consumers of choices" and potentially violate antitrust laws. X now seeks unspecified monetary damages and injunctive relief. 

In addition, video-sharing company Rumble, often favoured by right-wing influencers, has made similar claims in a separate lawsuit against WFA on Tuesday.

The WFA did not respond to Campaign Asia-Pacific's request for a comment at press time. 

Source:
Campaign Asia

Related Articles

Just Published

1 day ago

Magnite upgrades SpringServe video platform

The platform now combines its ad server and SSP to enhance programmatic efficiency for CTV and OTT players.

1 day ago

How ASICS India is turning footprints into funnel ...

From gait scans to geo-targeted ads, the sporting goods group laces together tech, retail, and events to chase India’s growing base of runners.

M&A deals continued to decline in 2024: COMVergence

Even as overall dealmaking declines, certain sectors such as ecommerce continue to be a major draw.

1 day ago

Personalisation gives 40% higher conversion to ...

India sees 163% revenue growth from contextual marketing campaigns in 2024, according to WebEngage trends report.